PARIS, New York Times, 11 Jun 2017-  As the first returns in Sunday’s parliamentary elections began to trickle in, French voters appeared to be rallying behind candidates on the ticket of the newly elected president, Emmanuel Macron.

Based on preliminary results from France’s 577 districts, pollsters projected that candidates for Mr. Macron’s party, La République en Marche, would receive 32 percent in voting for the National Assembly, the powerful lower house of the French Parliament.

If that holds up, it would far outpace the results of any other major party, all but assuring that Mr. Macron and his party will control the next parliamentary session, although nothing is certain until next week’s second-round vote.

Those candidates garnering 50 percent or more of the votes in their districts will be declared the winner. But given the large number of candidates for each seat, most of the top vote getters will face a runoff next Sunday.

Emmanuel Macron Embraces E.U. to Put France ‘Back in the Picture’ MAY 8, 2017
To claim a majority in Parliament, candidates supporting Mr. Macron will need to win at least 289 seats. Failing that, he has formed an alliance with the centrist Democratic Movement to help assure a majority. However, as things now stand, it appears all but certain that the 39-year-old president will have a majority — and potentially a large one.

Parties on the extreme right and left seemed to be faring badly, gaining far fewer votes nationwide than they had in the first round of the presidential election, on May 7. Pollsters said that Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Front would take about 14 percent of the vote while Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s leftist France Unbowed Party was expected to win just 11 percent of the votes.

At the same time, the traditional parties on the left and the right have been weakened, with the Socialists looking particularly feeble. Having controlled the Parliament over the last five years, the Socialists were expected to win just 10 percent of the vote this year. The Republicans fared better, with their projected 21 percent share the highest after Mr. Macron’s party.

Because of differences between the districts, nationwide vote totals do not translate into a set number of seats in the Parliament. There are frequently runoffs with two, three or four candidates, since anyone taking more than 12.5 percent of the vote is eligible for the second round.

Over all, however, the legislative elections appeared to have engendered less enthusiasm than both the presidential elections a few weeks ago and recent legislative elections.

Newsletter Sign UpContinue reading the main story
The Interpreter Newsletter
Understand the world with sharp insight and commentary on the major news stories of the week.

Enter your email address
 Sign Up

Receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times’s products and services.

SEE SAMPLE PRIVACY POLICY
OPT OUT OR CONTACT US ANYTIME
This year, according to exit polls, about 50 percent of eligible voters cast a ballot in the legislative elections, compared with 57 percent in 2012 and 60 percent in 2007.

Whatever the outcome, what is most striking about this election is how a nation that a year ago seemed to be on the verge of being swept up in the right-wing populist and nationalist wave in Europe has instead given a wide-armed embrace to Mr. Macron, a centrist and unabashed globalist who has called for weakening France’s protective labor laws and potentially reducing some retirement benefits for some workers.

The election — if a majority of Mr. Macron’s candidates win in the runoff, as it appears they will — seems to reflect the voters’ readiness to get on with his agenda.

The French president needs a majority in the National Assembly, the French Parliament, to pass legislation. With a strong showing for his party even in the first round, it suggests the French are signaling that they are ready to give his ideas a try. However, France has elected a series of presidents promising to change its labor and pension laws — both Nicolas Sarkozy on the right and François Hollande on the left made similar proposals — only to find that many in France turned against them when they tried to follow through with the changes.

In the past several elections, there was no question that once the French voted for a president, they would vote for his party in the legislature to assure him a majority. However, in the case of Mr. Macron, that was initially in doubt. In 2012, Mr. Hollande’s Socialist Party and its allies won 40 percent of the votes in the first round and in 2007 Mr. Sarkozy’s Republican Party and its allies won 46 percent; they both won majorities in the second round.

Like Mr. Macron, both men had won the presidency for the first time just weeks before the legislative vote. In Mr. Macron’s case, however, that was initially in doubt. His La République en Marche movement was founded only about 14 months ago, and his core idea of combining proposals from the left and the right of the political spectrum in pursuit of a common agenda was slow to take off.

Another reason to question whether he could gain a majority in Parliament was his central campaign promise to bring in many newcomers from civil society as candidates. He was good to his word, but that meant running candidates in many districts who had little or no name recognition.

But this seems not to have been a factor. The attraction of candidates untainted by politics seems to have outweighed the drawbacks of running a slate of virtual unknowns. There seems to be so much enthusiasm for Mr. Macron’s promise to bring a new political climate and an agenda that will bring growth to France that people are eager to support his candidates almost no matter what.